Sunday, April 23, 2006

Kallicles was Right

In Plato's Gorgias, Socrates, after vanquishing the famous sophist Gorgias and his student Polus, engages in discussion with Kallicles. Unlike almost every other Socratic interlocutor, Kallicles refuses to be drawn into Socrates' word games, and provides this refreshing opinion of over-educated nincompoops who focus exclusively on words and the ability to manipulate them:

I feel exactly the same too about students of philosophy. When I see a youth engaged in it, I admire it and it seems to me natural and I consider such a man ingenuous, and the man who does not pursue it I regard as illiberal and one who will never aspire to any fine or noble deed, but when I see an older man still studying philosophy and not deserting it, that man, Socrates, is actually asking for a whipping. For as I said just now, such a man, even if exceptionally gifted, is doomed to prove less than a man, shunning the city center and market place, in which the poet said that men win distinction, and living the rest of his life sunk in a corner muttering with three or four boys, and incapable of any utterance that is free and lofty and brilliant.
Kallicles recognized that the central charge against Socrates, that led to his death, was accurate. Socrates was accused of demoralizing the youth of Athens. And in a very literal way, that's precisely what Socrates had been doing. By constantly questioning and undermining Athenian traditions and values, and teaching the Athenian youth to do the same, he was stripping them of their morals. Not to mention their confidence and pride in their society and culture, thereby weakening Athens.

The same paradigm of moral relativism has been present in America since the 1960's. But in recent years, the Left has moved to the next stage in their jihad against traditional American values. They initially championed a free speech paradigm, so as to have the space in which to challenge and destroy traditional values. Now, having successfully inculcated a culture of anything goes relativism, and holding the vast majority of teaching positions, they are now boldly and shamelessly instilling their own left-wing orthodoxies into unsuspecting students, and ruthlessly punishing those on the Right who seek to exercise their free speech rights to disagree with the Left. (Town Hall columnist Mike Adams is the foremost chronicler of the suppression of conservatives on college campuses.)

In this as in many other things, Whittaker Chambers saw most deeply into the true nature of Leftists:

But as the struggle was really for revolutionary power, which in our age is always a struggle for control of the masses, that was the point at which they always betrayed their real character, for they reacted not like liberals, but with the fierceness of revolutionists whenever that power was at issue.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I gotta agree. Middle aged men and older still studying philosophy... man. that's just weak! at some point in your life, you gotta be able to do SOMEthing other than revel in your powers of cognition and meta-cognition. Glad you're doing this blog! Welcome to the blogosphere.

Anonymous said...

Callicles believed that might makes right, that those who were superior by his definition should take over and impose their own rules on others. Yet he also thought that sheepishly accepting the will of others was unnatural, albeit very common, so he basically consigned a large percentage of the population, the unwashed masses, to an unnatural existence.

It is not possible, now as in Plato's time, for any civilization to survive for long without freedom of speech. The open exchange of ideas is what imbues a society with the necessary vitality to improve itself. When either faction owns a disproportionate amount of power and suppresses all resistance to its ideology, the state loses the virtues that defined it.

As Whittaker Chambers said: "Without freedom the soul dies. Without the soul, there is no justification for freedom."
 

heartinsanfrancisco said...

Are you ever going to post again? I can forgive your not publishing my comment on May 24th - perhaps you've been too busy to see it - but there are very few blogs out there as well-written and literate as yours, and I've come to rely on your provocative views which make me reconsider my own.

So how 'bout it? Can't you do one for the Gipper?

heartinsanfrancisco said...

You're BACK!! And you're going to post again soon, right?

You've got fans out here. Responsibility. Nuggets to impart.

bgeorge77 said...

Kallicles: EXCELLENT post.
heartsinSF: EXCELLENT comment.

Kallicles is right about the Left's hiding behind free speech. heartsinSF is right about the necessity of free speech--but, hearts, I don't think you exactly addressed the issues in Kallicles' post (though you did bring up important points.)

My own thoughts: In Weimar Germany the Right did basically the same sort of fig-leafin', and not to draw ANY sort of comparison, but I think that the Evangelical-Right does that here in the US to some extent. (And I say that as a very devoted Catholic.)

I think that it's not so much a question of Left/Right as a question of Radical/Conservative. Radicals always hope to use the carefully constructed society of conservatives (term used broadly) as a springboard to power.

I recommend Czeslaw Milosz's "Native Realm." You would both like it.

Google